Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03249
Original file (BC 2014 03249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03249

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His son, the deceased former member, be reinstated to the grade of E-4.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His son was a model citizen and never in any trouble after leaving the Air Force.  He had an eight year old daughter, and if his grave marker reflected Sergeant rather than Air Basic   (E-1) that would be better.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The former member initially entered the Regular Air Force on 13 Dec 91.

On 13 Dec 94, the former member was promoted to the grade of Senior Airman (E-4).  

On 12 Jun 95, the former member was furnished an honorable discharge in the grade of E-1, and was credited with three years and six months of total active service.   

On 29 Jun 14, the former member passed away.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The application was not timely filed.  It has been over 19 years since the former member’s discharge.  The deceased former member received an Article 15 on 30 May 95 for willfully disobeying an order and being disrespectful toward a noncommissioned officer.  For this, he was reduced in rank to the grade of airman basic (E-1).  The applicant provides no evidence or documentation to support an error or injustice occurred.  Therefore, a change in the member’s grade is neither warranted nor appropriate.  Recommend this application be time barred. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after careful consideration of the available evidence of record, we find insufficient documentation was submitted to justify the relief requested.  In addition, we note this application was not filed within three years of the date the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603.  Given that the applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner.  


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03249 in Executive Session on 14 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence as considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Aug 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Decedent's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 22 Sep 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.

						


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01113

    Original file (BC 2014 01113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt) indicating the added points are not sufficient enough as to render him a select for any previous cycle. Based on the applicant’s 26 Feb 95 DOR to the grade of SrA, the first time he was considered for promotion to SSgt was cycle 96A5. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03077

    Original file (BC 2014 03077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03077 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for supplemental promotion to the grade of Master Sergeant (MSgt) by the Cycle 95E7 promotion board. The applicant's request for supplemental promotion consideration for cycle 95E7 was denied by AFPC/DPPPW (Enlisted Promotions) on 21 Aug 95 due to noncompliance with AF policy (AFI 36-2502,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03962

    Original file (BC 2013 03962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03962 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED FORMER SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The service member received an overall rating of 9 on the APR rendered for the period 20 Jul 74 through 26 May 75 with a recommendation to promote. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02434

    Original file (BC 2014 02434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02434 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was serving in the grade of airman first class (E-3) at the time of his discharge from the Regular Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01708

    Original file (BC 2014 01708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 3 Dec 07, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). His untimely application should be considered in the interest of justice because he received a form from the Physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00264

    Original file (BC 2013 00264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As a result of the failed FA’s, his projected promotion to the grade of SSgt was cancelled and he received a referral EPR. Although DPSOE initially recommended denial of the applicant’s request to be supplementally considered for promotion to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01490

    Original file (BC 2014 01490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Per AFI 36-2502, paragraph 2.8.3.1, a supplemental request based on a missing decoration must have a closeout date on or before the PECD and the commander’s recommendation date on the Décor-6 must be before the date AFPC makes the selections for promotion. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The investigation by his chain of command clearly shows credible evidence that the MSM recommendation was placed into military channels and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01797

    Original file (BC 2014 01797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Feb 14, according to information provided by the applicant, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) directed the removal of two of his FA failures ( and ) from the applicant’s AFFMS record. Although two of the six FA failures have been removed by the FAAB, the applicant does not have the support/approval of his commander, or the demotion authority, to restore his rank to Technical Sergeant (E-6). Therefore, the commander is within his authority to demote the applicant for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00202

    Original file (BC 2014 00202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00202 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His administrative demotion to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) be removed from his record and he be restored to his prior rank of Senior Airman (SrA/E-4). On 19 Mar 12, after reviewing the written statement submitted by the applicant and meeting with the applicant in person, the applicant’s commander...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02425

    Original file (BC 2014 02425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD...